AGE OF EMPIRES IV PREDICTIO TRIAL ERA DOESNT

Age Of Empires Iv Predictio Trial Era Doesnt

It also leads nicely into the rise of the Spanish Empire and the formation of the HRE. If Lious had not won then France would likely not have formed. Just because they boomed in industrial era doesnt make them worthy to be in top 8 in a medieval game!English and Frankish are very distinct, so distinct they were classified as such by the papacy unlike much of europe who were seen as Germanic/Latin.Also, the 100 years war is absolutely a large factor in the drawing up of europe. Thats it!Why are you filling such a short limit as 8 with stuff like Vikings, English and supposedly Japanese?Were these the superpowers of medieval times? Japanese were sth like Vietnamese in medieval age. Probably C.European one as Byzantines are a must.If you are planning on 8 civilizations at launch why the hell are you including Vikings or English?Put Franks for West Europe, put HRE for C.Europe, put Byzantines for East Europe, put Turks and Saracens for Middle East, put Mongols, put Chinese, put Delhi Sultanate.

Cities like Constantinople, Cairo, Baghdad, Merv, Khorasan, Herat, Samarqand, Bukhara.Battle of Talas that determined whether Central Asia will fall under Chinese Tang Empire or Abbasid Caliphate was far more important than the entire medieval history of England and France combined. The 'unique' designs of the civs has me hopeful for the future of this game but I dont doubt their pink haired employees will push for a 'diverse' game.Suprise suprise, noone cares for 100 years war except for West/Central Europeans or the Anglophone World.The center of the World was Middle East, Iran and Transoxiana. I do agree however it would be nice to see the saracens added for some fun crusading but no doubt that region will be a dlc including an order of knights like the Teutons or the Livonians vs Saracens and maybe Persians. It's the war that forever cemented the divide between Britain and the rest of Europe.

Khalid ibn Al Walids campaigns against Persia and Byzantine Empire were important. Mongol invasion attempt of Delhi Sultanate in India was important. Mongol invasions were important.

Not only people from Anglophone countries play these games.There are 8 civilizations and 3 of them are West European. We, the rest of the World dont care that much what some sea raiders did to it and its inner throne struggles.There are huge markets in other parts of the World too. England was an isolated backward island. Tamerlanes war against Ottomans in battle of Ankara was important.Of course there were important European battles and wars too but we are sick and tired of hearing about Battle of Hastings, 100 years war etc as if these are the cornerstones of medieval history. Battle of Manzikert and Battle of Myriokephalon between Seljuks and Byzantines were important. Islamic raids into India were important.

Franks, English and Vikings. It is 3 and it is too much for West Europe. Also disgusting of you to assume entire 160 million nation is terrorist supporter.It is not 2. Does it make you feel better to only see your own culture in video games?For the Afghan and Pakistani people, I dont want to go into politics but maybe if you stopped exploiting those peoples lands and fund and create terrorist organisations there maybe they would do sth. I dont know what is up with this small dick attitude. There was Byzantine Empire in East Europe.''If they want to see their own nations they can make their own game''We Turks made Mount and Blade 2 Bannerlord but we did a fine job representing other cultures too.

As you can tell historical accuracy is not something Microsoft cares for. The use of Briton in the previous game has always been a bit of a mistake by them as Britons are the modern Welsh but in the game they were used to be post Norman British. But looking at the gameplay it ends earlier than 3 as the cannons seen in gameplay are the larger ones used early on in the 100 years war and those are made in the final age. I bet those who say that are the same historians thinking a piece of wood is one of the most brilliant weapon designs of medieval era LMAO!When Turkic-Mongolian people had composite bows you people treat those piece of woods like they are sth worthy and for this make longbowmen OP in every game! LMAO!The period is early medieval hence the use of the name English rather than Briton from AOE2, this could also mean an inclusion of Welsh as a separate faction later down the line. But the difference between France and England.bruh it is equal to mountains!''I'll be purchasing a copy just to annoy you.''''(Also we weren't backwards, the idea of england as a dirty and uncivilized one is incredibly antiquated and has been disproven by far better historians than I)''Anyone is far better than you in history obviously. If a person in your mindset made that game there would be 2 Vlandian kingdoms, 2 Battanian Kingdoms and maybe 1 Aserai Sultanate.Also you thought IS is in Pakistan/Afghanistan? Though I understand you what is the difference between Pakistan, Afghanstan, Syria, Yemen anyway? They are all the same places.

It's the problem the Age games have always had, it's hard to have mongols and then also have say Poland when the formation of poland was directly as a result of the fall of the mongol empire, same as many other eastern european nations who forged their kingdoms as the mongols and their steppe descendants receded into the east. But almost no kingdoms existed by the mid to late medieval that were their in the dark ages, england became Britain, Franks formed their separate kingdoms most notably France. The game itself goes through dark ages-medieval as the ages stated in gameplay. Dont forget the Franks at one time ruled all of France-Germany-Northern Italy.

When HRE interactions were not really interesting in medieval time, they united a bunch of germans states, barbarossa didn't reach the Crusades, the most emblematic troops of HRE are in renaissance-early modern. Honestly in medieval Teutonic Order and their later Teutonic States had an higher influence, on baltic states and some slavic countries. I feel with the inclusion of 'dehli' and the much clearer hindu face of that nation they will seek to delineate between factions using modern terms, look for one of the many sultanates to be included later on I'm sure.Yeah if we want an accurate representations of the most influent civilization in Europe and a bit around Europe (because it's basically the trope of the game) the most influencial civ would be Franks of charlemagne, Romans/Byzantines, Seljuks Turks, Ummayad/Cordou, and Mongols.HRE was just an empire by name, but not really an empire in medieval time,HRE became significative in Renaissance, early modern time.

It's really marketing choicesRus would be an interesting choice, their influence in their zone was huge, and their early form (slavs leaded by norse adventurer) to the later (orthodox slavic and mercantile empire ), and their great clashes with mongols would be really original for a campaign.